01
Instead of measuring coolant cost per gallon, buyers would do better to focus on mixed fluid costs at desired concentration rates. For example, based on filling a 100-gallon sump at a desired refract reading of 5.5, the chart below demonstrates why. Surprisingly, the more expensive coolant costs less when mixed. The difference may seem insignificant at first, but when multiplied by the number of machines, these costs add up over time.
02
Recirculated chip fines affect tool life, part finish, machine ways, and ball screw wear. Along with filtration, proper coolant management has a significant effect on chip drop out. Proper filtration and fluid management will increase machine and tool life, reducing downtime and maintenance expenses.
03
The more coolant required (as with Coolant A in the above chart), the higher the shipping costs, the more paperwork required, the more accounts payable generated, and the more employee time needed. Proper fluid management reduces paperwork and shipping costs.
04
Lack of cleanliness makes a negative impression, perhaps serving as a deterrent to potential customers. In addition, a dirty work environment can contribute to higher employee dissatisfaction and turnover. Fortunately, proper fluid mixes keep machines cleaner for employee health and the work area more attractive to potential customers.
05
Unwanted residue on machines and parts cause chip-sticking, machine wear and additional cleaning costs. Proper coolant selection and fluid management will eliminate such factors.
06
Coolant replacement in the sump results in labor costs, waste disposal costs, coolant costs, and machine downtime. Proper fluid management increases sump life, decreasing sump-related maintenance expenses.